![]() ![]() Finally, it dismisses the opposition as hypocritical as the opposition too deployed raids towards political ends when in power. It claims it is just bringing the corrupt old guard to book. It claims that it’s merely ensuring there are no holy cows immune from the rule of law. The government dismisses any protest against these raids as meaningless brouhaha, and claims it is only the law taking its own course. The raids against the regime’s political opponents have become a regular and persistent aspect of our polity they no longer surprise or shock us. In short, let’s add a small band-aid solution so that players can at least buy some time for reaction.With the Central Bureau of Investigation arresting Delhi deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia in the excise policy case, the blatant targeting of opposition parties and leaders through central agencies has reached a new pinnacle. Rejecting it won’t have any meaningful effect. Approving it will temporarily decrease tax evasion threat but will cost approval of capitalist, self-employed, wealthy, and a bit of GDP (or business confidence). This dilemma will be triggered if the Tax Evasion situation is about to happen but yet to be actually triggered. ( someone explaining how consuming it is for entrepreneurs to deal with tax audits) ( something about how bad it would be if tax evasion becomes prevalent) ![]() However, some economic officials are opposing the plan saying that ‘it would put substantial burdens on corporations to prepare unexpected tax audits’ and thus will hurt the economy. On that basis, they are urging you to approve an extensive tax audit proposal on a large number of corporations and rich individuals. Tax inspectors are reporting that they’ve found evidences suggesting tax frauds are at rise and could become potential problems in near future. So here’s my idea - let’s add a dilemma written below. But I understand tax evasion could be unexpected or rather punishing in early stages. IIRC you can already collect 70% income tax and it’s already kinda unreasonably high. I’m not sure this game really needs to allow higher tax revenue. This event should only activate if the player has a tax evasion crisis. Basically, doing the morally right thing carries enough penalties to model why real leaders don’t do this. Slight down tick on the tax evasion crisis, significant down tick on foreign investment, uptick on uncompetitive economy and corporate exodus + some opinion changes. No material change as this is a continuation of the status quo, but annoys socialists. Given the nature of multi-national companies they could simply pick of and leave, so enforcement wouldn’t bring in much revenue and would drive out a lot of investment. As an example: one where it’s been an open secret for some time that the tax paid by a large multi-national company operating in the country doesn’t reflect the revenues they generate, and attention is now focused on it. Make a couple dilemmas which deal with the tax evasion crisis. ![]() Add a link between diverted profits tax and tax evasion. Make some law and order policies which address white collar crime (again, kind of deserves it’s own post). Make corruption harder to reduce to zero (that one kind of deserves it own post), and make low corruption reduce tax evasion. Add a link between the anti-corruption agency and tax evasion. Yes, there’s the 3rd option of the DT approach of “wealthy people wouldn’t evade tax if you didn’t tax them!”, but I’m trying to get Japan to a balanced budget, and I’m role playing a national leader, not a reality TV star.Īnyways, 2 tools isn’t very much player agency so, as usual, I have some suggestions: Currently there are 2 things which actively decrease tax evasion: Public Tax Returns, and Unexplained Wealth Orders. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |